<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sky+ and Remote Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/</link>
	<description>Wireless internet connected devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:36:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johnny-p-</title>
		<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/comment-page-1/#comment-10097</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny-p-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/#comment-10097</guid>
		<description>i have to disagree with you on that james! what alot of peopel don&#039;t seem torealise is that SKY are not trying to rip people off with a £10 PM subs chatge it&#039;s that, 1) it costs a fortune to broadcast an upgraded channel and 2) it&#039;s not that thwy want to intentionally charge it, it&#039;s that most of the other cahnnels in HD that are not owned by sky charge them a fortune so that&#039;s why they charge it. but to be fair if you have got a HD ready TV no matter how good it is 1080p or not my friend there is no picture quality improvement until there is a HD receiver ( SKY HD BOX) in place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to disagree with you on that james! what alot of peopel don&#8217;t seem torealise is that SKY are not trying to rip people off with a £10 PM subs chatge it&#8217;s that, 1) it costs a fortune to broadcast an upgraded channel and 2) it&#8217;s not that thwy want to intentionally charge it, it&#8217;s that most of the other cahnnels in HD that are not owned by sky charge them a fortune so that&#8217;s why they charge it. but to be fair if you have got a HD ready TV no matter how good it is 1080p or not my friend there is no picture quality improvement until there is a HD receiver ( SKY HD BOX) in place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>I recently watch a couple of film in HD on the Xbox 360, it was glorious! However,  like you I&#039;m not really prepared to pay £120 per year to watch a handful of channels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently watch a couple of film in HD on the Xbox 360, it was glorious! However,  like you I&#8217;m not really prepared to pay £120 per year to watch a handful of channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9596</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/#comment-9596</guid>
		<description>I looked into SKY HD but for the cost of the HD box (£200-300) AND a monthly subscription (£10) just to watch only a handful of channels in HD, I really couldn&#039;t justify it.  I&#039;ll wait a few more years before I jump on that bandwagon..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked into SKY HD but for the cost of the HD box (£200-300) AND a monthly subscription (£10) just to watch only a handful of channels in HD, I really couldn&#8217;t justify it.  I&#8217;ll wait a few more years before I jump on that bandwagon..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9595</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I got ahead of myself there for a moment . . . I thought you meant Sky HD! Oh well, it&#039;s still a good deal for Sky .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I got ahead of myself there for a moment . . . I thought you meant Sky HD! Oh well, it&#8217;s still a good deal for Sky .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://igadgetlife.com/gadgets/sky-and-remote-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://igadgetlife.com/2007/09/10/sky-and-remote-record/#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>Hang on. Let me get this straight. I can upgrade to Sky  for just the cost of the box, no upgrade needed for the sub?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on. Let me get this straight. I can upgrade to Sky  for just the cost of the box, no upgrade needed for the sub?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
